| Letters | 
| Send comments to: editorG2mil@Gmail.com We have space for most, but not all comments. Let us know if you want us to include your organization and e-mail address. Some letters may end up as content elsewhere in G2mil. Avoid political comments, this is a weapons, warfare, and tactics website. 
    Right on! I spent my time in Okinawa, Thule Greenland, Kunsan Korea, Berlin
    and Bitburg. That was needed back when the Sovs could have launched a
    flat-footed attack. Now those instant-reaction bases are not needed under
    today's climate. And if tomorrow's climate changes, I see no reason why the
    affected powers would not roll out a red carpet for us to deploy. We can
    maintain a 'deployable' status right here in the US using our own indigenous
    'remote' bases; we certainly have enough of those. Eglin/LeJeune areas
    make a pretty good hot humid area in the summer; Nellis/Indian
    Springs/Tonopah and Forts Irwin and Huachuca for desert, Drum, Carson
    and Richardson/Eielson for arctic - we're all set!  Pull our guys back
    home. I only wish we could clean out the bases of all the goodies and bring
    that back too.
   
    On a second train of thougght - how would you feel about setting up a
    repository for all the 'corporate knowledge' us guys who have been there
    came up with and yet somehow that has been forgotten or overlooked in the
    current active force? I told Al Huber about using CBU 24 as a 'shotgun' for
    CAS - it was new to him. basically it involves a 10-30* angle high speed
    (500-550) pass with the fuze set to open at about 800 AGL. Threw all 665
    bomblets ahead like a giant shotgun. Used it during a heloevac at Dong Hoi
    (I think) to supress NVN MG fire interfering with the evac. Worked great.
    Only needed one can per hostile fire incident to keep them silenced. This is
    an example of a tactic that isn't in the books. I debriefed Intel and that
    was it. Doubtless in the archives someplace, but where, God only knows.
    Depending on old NCOS and word of mouth makes us keep re-inventing the
    wheel.
   
    Walt BJ
   
    --- Bjorneby Walter
   
 By 45 the germans had the tools they wanted for infantry, and considerable 
    That's certainly an option, but $3000 per four pound missile is a lot.
    I'd prefer at least 10 lbs.  They weren't too specific about the guidance.
   
    Carlton
   
    ----- Original Message -----
     
      From: "Brent Smith" <brent_smith_va@yahoo.com>
     
      To: <editorG2mil@Gmail.com>
     
      Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 5:04 PM
     
      Subject: MPIM - Modern Infantry Squad
     > Spike missile project? > > http://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/article.cfm?Id=674 > > At 20 lbs, the MPIM is too heavy for your dedicated > Rocker, IMHO. He can probably only carry two rounds, > at most. The 4 lb Spike missile won't kill a tank but > would be useful against softer targets. The biggest > drawback I see is its daytime-only seeker. I'd ditch > it and go back to some form of wireless SACLOS or > MPIM-like inertial. > > Just my 2 cents.. > > Thanks for the great site. > > -Brent Smith > > > > ; |